Desert Sun States On Gay Councilman’s Adam4Adam Account For… Just What Reason Precisely?
Desert Sun States On Gay Councilman’s Adam4Adam Account For… Just What Reason Precisely? Really, what exactly is incorrect having a city that is local, that is solitary and freely gay, in search of intercourse inside the off hours? Do single people that are straight intercourse? I believe they are doing. Do they often contain it […]
Desert Sun States On Gay Councilman’s Adam4Adam Account For… Just What Reason Precisely?

Really, what exactly is incorrect having a city that is local, that is solitary and freely gay, in search of intercourse inside the off hours? Do single people that are straight intercourse? I believe they are doing. Do they often contain it with individuals they’ve just met, at pubs or events? Why, yes they do. Therefore is the fact that brand brand brand new standard – in the event that you even vaguely intimate that you’re enthusiastic about resting with another person, it is news! Because right dudes, once they victoriahearts.com head to pubs, they never go searching to obtain set. Oh no. It’s only for an amiable platonic drink with buddies. No intercourse, straight please, we’re.

You can find a few things going on in this tale. First, homophobia. just How salacious that a homosexual guy ended up being wanting to get set (oh my!). 2nd, Internet-phobia. How salacious that somebody used the net to attempt to fulfill another being that is human. Kate McGinty couldn’t have cared less had an unmarried heterosexual town councilman ended up being utilizing eHarmony to satisfy females (in which he suggested in their profile which he really might just give consideration to resting with those ladies!)…

It’s abominable that it was thought by this newspaper highly relevant to write on this.

– John Aravosis using the Desert Sun to task for writing a non-story about Desert Hot Springs city council member Karl Baker utilizing a photograph of himself in council on their Adam4Adam account. Must’ve been a reeeeeeaaaalllly sluggish news time.

Get Queerty Daily

11 Reviews

Minimal Kiwi

This will be an more example that is extreme of Anthony Weiner-style nonsense.

Exactly why is this a concern? How come individuals care? What exactly is UP with Us citizens having priorities into the wrong destination?

have a look online – you’ll find a lot of photographs of elected officials glorifying the application of firearms. this even though 30,000 Americans are killed EACH by gun violence year.

where’s the uproar over that? folks are too busy being mad in regards to the intercourse other folks are experiencing.

your brain boggles.

No. 1 · minimal Kiwi published, “This is a far more extreme exemplory instance of the Anthony Weiner-style nonsense.”

Oh, it is even even worse than that. Glance at the image of him – if it’s the only he used, he demonstrably wasn't hunting for sex at Adam4Adam.com but ended up being instead searching for individuals enthusiastic about a slumber celebration where they actually sleep!

The image obviously shows him dozing off (hardly a shock for it. while he had been probably listening for some constituent drone on about representing the Veterans of Foreign ladies, which as 30 regular people, 15 associate people, 23 honorary people, and 3 interns that do the actual work but don’t receive money)

Tommy

exactly How foolish of him to possess their face pic open.He should experienced it locked.He can be looking that is really nasty bet he didn’t get numerous times.He must certanly be fired I don’t want my town councilman on adam 4 adam.

@Tommy: No, I’m sure you would prefer to them take part in surreptitious nepotism or cronyism…get a life.

Pocket Otter

Judging from that image, I’m sort of guessing Mr. Baker doesn’t get a whole lot of reactions in their inbox. Or their outbox. Or mailbox, toolbox, cereal box—let’s face it, the man may have now been a target of yellowish journalism, but purdy he ain’t.

James

This really is a problem because he utilized his town council photo (browse the article to start to see the image he used). I would find that more problematic if he had a personal picture and this article was still printed.

And btw, what’s with all the comments that are shallow? Their look has nothing in connection with the problem in front of you.

ousslander

I don’t believe it is homophobic. He place their personal life away on display, so he can’t be angry that some body penned about any of it.

Thomas Maguire

Because when did a bewigged wilford brimley come down as a homo?

JoeyB

He’s gross, like the majority of guys on Adam4Adam.

Jon Tom

It’s nothing but an ole fashioned witch look! Whom cares exactly exactly what he seems like!

Manny Espinola

“This is a concern because he utilized their town council picture.”

Really? Meaning the picture is federal government home? Like in taken with federal federal government digital camera and/or uploaded on a national government workplace computer?

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *